A dark web hacker that goes by the name “Tombstone” has claimed and advertised multiple vulnerabilities affecting a subdomain affiliated with Google LLC. The hacker claimed these flaws on the Russian-language cybercrime forum Exploit and stressed the susceptibility of the domain to XSS-DOM and prototype pollution show more ...
vulnerabilities. Screenshots shared by threat actor Tombstone showcased 'edu.google.com' as one of the allegedly impacted domains, raising concerns about potential exploits. Tombstone's post on Exploit lacked a specified price for the vulnerabilities, urging interested parties to initiate private communications for further details. The disclosed vulnerabilities pose significant risks to Google and its associated services, warranting immediate attention to mitigate potential cyber threats. "These vulnerabilities are in the software, not the source code Note that I only sell bugs with POC and full proof not exploits With a great price for long-term cooperation in other projects Exchange of Apple, FB, Meta, Microsoft banks", reads the threat actor post. Dark Web Hacker Claims Prototype Pollution and XSS-DOM Vulnerability [caption id="attachment_76830" align="alignnone" width="1108"] Source: Dark Web[/caption] The vulnerabilities advertised by Tombstone have direct implications for Google LLC, a prominent entity within the IT & ITES industry. Notably, domains such as google.com and edu.google.com have been identified as being at risk, primarily affecting users currently using the Google services. The vulnerabilities disclosed by Tombstone encompass XSS-DOM and prototype pollution, both of which can serve as entry points for malicious cyber activities. XSS-DOM vulnerabilities, in particular, enable threat actors to inject client-side scripts into web pages viewed by other users, potentially leading to session hijacking, phishing attacks, malware distribution, and data theft. Prototype pollution vulnerabilities, however, involve manipulating a JavaScript object's prototype to achieve unintended behavior, often resulting in unauthorized data manipulation or code execution. The combination of these vulnerabilities within Google's subdomain highlights the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard against potential cyberattacks. Previous Incidents and Security Research Prior to Tombstone's disclosure, security researcher Henry N. Caga had identified the XSS vulnerability within a Google subdomain, further emphasizing the susceptibility of Google's infrastructure to such exploits. Caga's research revealed the presence of a vulnerability within the URL associated with 'https://aihub.cloud.google.com,' prompting an in-depth investigation. Despite initial challenges in replicating the XSS pop-up, Caga's persistence ultimately led to the discovery of a double-encoded payload that triggered the vulnerability. Subsequent testing unveiled the widespread nature of the vulnerability across all URLs within the aihub.cloud.google.com domain, accentuating the severity of the issue. Following responsible disclosure protocols, Caga promptly reported the findings to Google's security team, accompanied by comprehensive documentation and proof of concept scripts. Google's swift response included an upgrade in the issue's priority and severity levels, acknowledging Caga's contributions with a reward of $4,133.70, along with a $1,000 bonus for the thoroughness of the report and proof of concept scripts. Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.
The notorious hacker group SN Blackmeta has allegedly claimed responsibility for a cyberattack on Snapchat's infrastructure. The Snapchat cyberattack has reportedly led to disruptions in service in specific regions and the disabling of login and account creation features within the app. In a post attributed to show more ...
SN Blackmeta, the threat actor outlined their motives for the cyberattack on Snapchat, citing reasons such as their opposition to the content promoted by the social media platform, which they claim includes pornography and undermines moral values. Additionally, the group accuses the application of supporting Israel while opposing efforts in support of Palestine. These grievances, according to SN Blackmeta, prompted them to target Snapchat as a means to "test their strength." Decoding the Snapchat Cyberattack by SN Blackmeta [caption id="attachment_76796" align="alignnone" width="379"] Source: X[/caption] The claimed Snapchat cyberattack has allegedly resulted in service disruptions in certain countries and the temporary incapacitation of key features within the Snapchat application. Despite SN Blackmeta's claims, Snapchat has not yet released an official statement about the incident, leaving the details of the cyberattack unconfirmed. The Cyber Express has reached out to the company, and we are currently awaiting their response. [caption id="attachment_76798" align="alignnone" width="372"] Source: X[/caption] Interestingly, this isn't the first time SN Blackmeta has made headlines for their cyber activities. In the past few days alone, the group has launched attacks on various targets, including the Social Security Administration (SSA) website and Microsoft's OneDrive. These attacks aim to disrupt services and hinder user access, demonstrating the group's proficiency in executing cyber warfare. The recent surge in cyberattacks by SN Blackmeta comes amidst a backdrop of escalating tensions in the digital world. Other hacktivist groups have also been active, targeting prominent organizations and government entities with coordinated attacks. Previous Cybersecurity Challenges The current Snapchat cyberattack is not the first time that the Snap INC-owned platform has faced cybersecurity challenges. The most recent controversy with Snapchat was reported by Vice in May 2019 wherein researchers discovered that Snapchat employees were misusing their access privileges to spy on users. This breach of trust raised concerns about user privacy and data security within the platform. Between January 2014 and February 2018, Snapchat faced a series of cybersecurity challenges. In July 2017, a phishing attack compromised over 55,000 accounts by luring users to a fake login page. The attackers then published stolen credentials, granting unauthorized access. In February 2016, a phishing scam targeted Snapchat employees, resulting in the disclosure of payroll information. The October 2014 incident involved a third-party app hack, leaking 200,000 explicit images. Though Snapchat denied system compromise, blame was placed on the app providers. In January 2014, a security vulnerability led to the exposure of 4.6 million user details, despite Snapchat's claim of addressing the issue promptly. As for the current Snapchat cyberattack claim, this is an ongoing story and The Cyber Express will be closely monitoring the situation. We’ll update this post once we have more information on the alleged cyberattack on the social media platform or any official confirmation from Snap INC. Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.
Pure Storage, a provider of cloud storage systems and services, has confirmed and addressed a security incident involving unauthorized access to one of its Snowflake data analytics workspaces. This workspace contained telemetry information used by Pure Storage to provide proactive customer support services. The Pure show more ...
Storage data breach involved a third party temporarily gaining access to the workspace, which housed data such as company names, LDAP usernames, email addresses, and the Purity software release version number. Importantly, no sensitive information like credentials for array access or any other data stored on customer systems was compromised. "Such information is never and can never be communicated outside of the array itself, and is not part of any telemetry information. Telemetry information cannot be used to gain unauthorized access to customer systems," stated Pure Storage in an official statement. Pure Storage Data Breach: Investigation Ongoing Upon knowing about the cybersecurity incident, Pure Storage took immediate action to block any further unauthorized access to the workspace. The company emphasized that no unusual activity has been detected on other elements of its infrastructure. “We see no evidence of unusual activity on other elements of the Pure infrastructure. Pure is monitoring our customers’ systems and has not found any unusual activity. We are currently in contact with customers who similarly have not detected unusual activity targeting their Pure systems,” reads the official statement. Preliminary findings from a cybersecurity firm engaged by Pure Storage support the company's conclusions about the nature of the exposed information. Pure Storage simplifies data storage with a cloud experience that empowers organizations to maximize their data while reducing the complexity and cost of managing the infrastructure behind it. Thousands of customers, including high-profile companies like Meta, Ford, JP Morgan, NASA, NTT, AutoNation, Equinix, and Comcast, use Pure Storage's data storage platform. Context of Recent Snowflake Cybersecurity Incidents Before the Pure Storage data breach, Advance Auto Parts, Inc., a significant provider of automobile aftermarket components, allegedly suffered a massive data breach. A threat actor known as “Sp1d3r” claimed responsibility, alleging the theft of three terabytes of data from the company’s Snowflake cloud storage, which is reportedly being sold for $1.5 million. Live Nation, the parent company of Ticketmaster, also confirmed "unauthorized activity" on its database hosted by Snowflake, a Boston-based cloud storage and analytics company. In a joint advisory with Mandiant and CrowdStrike, Snowflake revealed that attackers used stolen customer credentials to target accounts lacking multi-factor authentication protection. Mandiant linked these attacks to a financially motivated threat actor tracked as UNC5537 since May 2024. This malicious actor gains access to Snowflake customer accounts using credentials stolen in historical infostealer malware infections dating back to 2020. These cyberattacks have targeted hundreds of organizations worldwide, extorting victims for financial gain. So far, the cybersecurity firm has identified hundreds of customer Snowflake credentials exposed in Vidar, RisePro, Redline, Racoon Stealer, Lumm, and Metastealer malware attacks. Snowflake and Mandiant have notified around 165 organizations potentially exposed to these ongoing cyberattacks.
In a bold attempt to redefine cloud security and privacy standards, Apple has unveiled Private Cloud Compute (PCC), a groundbreaking cloud intelligence system designed to back its new Apple Intelligence with safety and transparency while integrating Apple devices into the cloud. The move comes after recognition of the show more ...
widespread concerns surrounding the combination of artificial intelligence and cloud technology. Private Cloud Compute Aims to Secure Cloud AI Processing Apple has stated that its new Private Cloud Compute (PCC) is designed to enforce privacy and security standards over AI processing of private information. For the first time ever, Private Cloud Compute brings the same level of security and privacy that our users expect from their Apple devices to the cloud," said an Apple spokesperson. [caption id="attachment_76690" align="alignnone" width="1492"] Source: security.apple.com[/caption] At the heart of PCC is Apple's stated commitment to on-device processing. When Apple is responsible for user data in the cloud, we protect it with state-of-the-art security in our services," the spokesperson explained. "But for the most sensitive data, we believe end-to-end encryption is our most powerful defense." Despite this commitment, Apple has stated that for more sophisticated AI requests, Apple Intelligence needs to leverage larger, more complex models in the cloud. This presented a challenge to the company, as traditional cloud AI security models were found lacking in meeting privacy expectations. Apple stated that PCC is designed with several key features to ensure the security and privacy of user data, claiming the following implementations: Stateless computation: PCC processes user data only for the purpose of fulfilling the user's request, and then erases the data. Enforceable guarantees: PCC is designed to provide technical enforcement for the privacy of user data during processing. No privileged access: PCC does not allow Apple or any third party to access user data without the user's consent. Non-targetability: PCC is designed to prevent targeted attacks on specific users. Verifiable transparency: PCC provides transparency and accountability, allowing users to verify that their data is being processed securely and privately. Apple Invites Experts to Test Standards; Online Reactions Mixed At this week's Apple Annual Developer Conference, Apple's CEO Tim Cook described Apple Intelligence as a "personal intelligence system" that could understand and contextualize personal data to deliver results that are "incredibly useful and relevant," making "devices even more useful and delightful." Apple Intelligence mines and processes data across apps, software and services across Apple devices. This mined data includes emails, images, messages, texts, messages, documents, audio files, videos, contacts, calendars, Siri conversations, online preferences and past search history. The new PCC system attempts to ease consumer privacy and safety concerns. In its description of 'Verifiable transparency,' Apple stated: "Security researchers need to be able to verify, with a high degree of confidence, that our privacy and security guarantees for Private Cloud Compute match our public promises. We already have an earlier requirement for our guarantees to be enforceable. Hypothetically, then, if security researchers had sufficient access to the system, they would be able to verify the guarantees." However, despite Apple's assurances, the announcement of Apple Intelligence drew mixed reactions online, with some already likening it to Microsoft's Recall. In reaction to Apple's announcement, Elon Musk took to X to announce that Apple devices may be banned from his companies, citing the integration of OpenAI as an 'unacceptable security violation.' Others have also raised questions about the information that might be sent to OpenAI. [caption id="attachment_76692" align="alignnone" width="596"] Source: X.com[/caption] [caption id="attachment_76693" align="alignnone" width="418"] Source: X.com[/caption] [caption id="attachment_76695" align="alignnone" width="462"] Source: X.com[/caption] According to Apple's statements, requests made on its devices are not stored by OpenAI, and users’ IP addresses are obscured. Apple stated that it would also add “support for other AI models in the future.” Andy Wu, an associate professor at Harvard Business School, who researches the usage of AI by tech companies, highlighted the challenges of running powerful generative AI models while limiting their tendency to fabricate information. “Deploying the technology today requires incurring those risks, and doing so would be at odds with Apple’s traditional inclination toward offering polished products that it has full control over.” Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.
Microsoft has released the June 2024 Patch Tuesday updates, reinforcing security and enhancing functionality for Windows 11 and 10 users alike. Among these updates, the tech giant has also addressed 49 vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft environments and products. “Microsoft patched 49 CVEs in its June 2024 Patch show more ...
Tuesday release, another sub-60 CVE release for the second month in a row. This month, Microsoft did not patch any zero-day vulnerabilities exploited in the wild. Typically, Microsoft Patch Tuesday releases skew towards being mostly remote code execution vulnerabilities," said Satnam Narang, Senior Staff Research Engineer at Tenable. For those using the Windows 11 operating systems with versions 23H2 and 22H2, the KB5039212 patch awaits in the Windows Update queue. This comprehensive Microsoft Patch Tuesday Update introduces several notable tweaks. Microsoft Patch Tuesday Update: All the Major Developments and Fixes With this June Microsoft Patch Tuesday update, the tech giant has introduced a slew of user-friendly updates, including the ability to generate QR codes directly from the Windows Share menu in Microsoft Edge, facilitating seamless sharing of webpages and cloud files. Enhancements to the Windows Share feature now allow users to easily email content to themselves using their linked email address from their Microsoft account, while a subtle but impactful change prevents the abrupt dismissal of the Windows Share window, requiring users to click the designated close button instead. File management is streamlined with the ability to drag files between breadcrumbs within the File Explorer address bar, simplifying the process of relocating files within the same file path. Additionally, a new "Linked devices" page in the Settings menu enables users logged in with a Microsoft account to seamlessly manage their PCs and Xbox consoles, while the Windows Backup app now integrates with Microsoft accounts, offering secure backup options for files, themes, settings, installed apps, and Wi-Fi credentials to the cloud. Microsoft has also addressed underlying issues with this June 2024 Patch Tuesday, including a fix for an issue causing the taskbar to briefly malfunction or become unresponsive, as well as resolving an issue hindering systems from resuming from hibernation post-BitLocker activation. “In 2023, remote code execution flaws accounted for over one-third (35.1%) of all CVEs patched. However, this Patch Tuesday release was dominated by elevation of privilege flaws, accounting for nearly half of the CVEs patched (49%) this month. Microsoft patched CVE-2024-30089, an elevation of privilege flaw in the Microsoft Streaming Service. Like many of the elevation of privilege flaws patched as part of Patch Tuesday, Microsoft labelled this one as “Exploitation More Likely,” said Narang. For Windows 11 users on the original iteration of the OS (21H2), the KB5039213 patch primarily focuses on bug fixes, with the added activation of the SMB over QUIC client certificate authentication feature, providing IT administrators with enhanced control over client access to SMB over QUIC servers. Addressing 49 Vulnerabilities with Vigilance With cyber threats looming large, Microsoft's June 2024 Patch Tuesday release stands as a protective measure against hackers and ransomware groups alike, addressing a total of 49 CVEs. Among these, one is rated critical, marking a concerted effort to shore up security defenses. Notably, there have been no reported zero-day or publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, underscoring Microsoft's proactive stance on security. Elevation of Privilege (EoP) vulnerabilities take center stage, constituting 49% of the patched vulnerabilities this month, followed closely by Remote Code Execution (RCE) at 36.7%. Several critical vulnerabilities have been identified, including CVE-2024-30080, a Remote Code Execution flaw in Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) with a CVSSv3 score of 9.8, deemed highly exploitable by Microsoft. Additionally, CVE-2024-30082, CVE-2024-30087, and CVE-2024-30091 highlight the significance of patching critical components like the Win32k driver to prevent potential exploits. Similarly, attention is drawn to Windows Kernel vulnerabilities CVE-2024-30064, CVE-2024-30068, CVE-2024-30088, and CVE-2024-30099, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive patch management. Moreover, CVE-2024-30085 highlights the varied attack vectors adversaries may exploit, necessitating swift remediation. “These types of flaws are notoriously useful for cybercriminals seeking to elevate privileges on a compromised system. When exploited in the wild as a zero-day, they are typically associated with more advanced persistent threat actors or as part of targeted attacks," said Narang. He added further, "This vulnerability was disclosed to Microsoft by the same security researcher that disclosed CVE-2023-36802, another Microsoft Streaming Service elevation of privilege flaw, which was patched in the September 2023 Patch Tuesday. Curiously, that flaw was disclosed by the researcher, but it was Microsoft themselves that noted it as being exploited in the wild. Another Microsoft Streaming Service flaw was patched this month (CVE-2024-30090), but unlike CVE-2024-30089, this one is labeled as “Exploitation Less Likely.” Concurrently, Microsoft's cessation of security updates for Windows 10 21H2 across several editions stresses the importance of timely upgrades to ensure ongoing protection against online threats.
The MEDUSA ransomware group has reared its ugly head again and this time it has claimed to have targeted three new victims: GEMCO Constructors, Dynamo Electric and Farnell Packaging. The ransomware group’s dark web portal highlighted these additions, adding to their growing list of victims. Like many of its earlier show more ...
attacks, the group has not disclosed crucial details, such as the type of compromised data. It has, however, demanded a bounty of US $900,000 from GEMCO and $100,000 each from Dynamo and Farnell Packaging to stop leaking its internal data. MEDUSA Ransomware Attack: The Latest Victims GEMCO Constructors is headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. The ransomware actors have claimed to have access to 1.0 TB of the organization's data and has threatened to publish it within 6-7 days. The second company that the group has claimed to have targeted is Dynamo, which is based in Saskatchewan, Canada. Data of the company, which specializes in electrical and electronic manufacturing, has allegedly been compromised. MEDUSA has claimed to have exfiltrated 149.6 GB of the organization's data and plans to publish it within 6-7 days. Farnell Packaging, a Canadian company in the packaging and container industry, has also allegedly been attacked. The attackers claimed to have accessed 193.9 GB of the organization's data and warned the data would be published within 8–9 days. Despite the gigantic claims made by the ransomware group, the official websites of the targeted companies seem to be fully operational, with no signs of foul play. The organizations, however, have not yet responded to the alleged cyberattack, leaving the claims made by the ransomware group unverified. The article would be updated once the respective organizations respond to the claims. The absence of confirmation raises the question of the authenticity of the ransomware claim. It remains to be seen whether it is a tactic employed by MEDUSA to garner attention or if there are ulterior motives attached to their actions. Only an official statement by the affected companies can shed light on the true nature of the situation. However, if the claims made by the MEDUSA ransomware group do turn out to be true, then the consequences could be far-reaching. The potential leak of sensitive data could pose a significant threat to the affected organizations and their employees. Background of MEDUSA Ransomware Group MEDUSA first burst onto the scene in June 2021 and has since targeted organizations in various countries across multiple industries, including healthcare, education, manufacturing, and retail. Most of the companies, though, have been established in the United States of America. MEDUSA functions as a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) platform. It provides would-be attackers with malicious software and infrastructure required to carry out disruptive ransomware attacks. The ransomware group also has a public Telegram channel that threat actors use to post data that might be stolen, which could be an attempt to extort organizations and demand payment. Previous Ransomware Attacks Less than three weeks ago, MEDUSA ransomware group claimed a cyberattack on Comwave, a Canadian communications giant renowned for providing internet, network security solutions, and customer support services. In January 2024, a prominent non-profit organization, Water For People, was targeted by the group. The organization faced the pressure of a deadline to comply with the demands of the ransomware group. MEDUSA also targeted four organizations across different countries, including France, Italy, and Spain. The group’s modus operandi remains uniform, with announcements being made on their dark web forum accompanied by deadlines and ransom demands. As organizations deal with the fallout of cyberattacks by groups like MEDUSA, it becomes crucial to remain vigilant and implement stringent security measures. Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.
The United Kingdom and Canada privacy watchdogs announced a joint investigation this week to determine the security lapses in the genetic testing company 23andMe’s October data breach, which leaked ancestry data of 6.9 million individuals worldwide. The UK Information Commissioner John Edwards and Privacy show more ...
Commissioner of Canada Philippe Dufresne will lead the investigation, pooling the resources and expertise of their respective offices. Focus of 23andMe Data Breach Investigation The joint investigation will examine three key aspects: Scope of Information Exposed: The breadth of data affected by the breach and the potential harm to individuals arising from it. Security Measures: Evaluate whether 23andMe had adequate safeguards to protect the sensitive information under its control. Breach Notification: Review whether the company provided timely and adequate notification to the regulators and affected individuals, as mandated by Canadian (PIPEDA) and UK (GDPR) data protection laws. Edwards said the investigation was needed to garner the trust of people in organizations that handle sensitive personal data. He stated: “People need to trust that any organization handling their most sensitive personal information has the appropriate security and safeguards in place. This data breach had an international impact, and we look forward to collaborating with our Canadian counterparts to ensure the personal information of people in the UK is protected.” Dufresne on the other hand stated the risks associated with genetic information in the wrong hands. He said: “In the wrong hands, an individual’s genetic information could be misused for surveillance or discrimination. Ensuring that personal information is adequately protected against attacks by malicious actors is an important focus for privacy authorities in Canada and around the world.” The data protection and privacy laws in the UK and Canada allow such joint investigations on matters that impact both jurisdictions. Each regulator will assess compliance with the relevant laws they oversee. Neither of the privacy commissioner offices however provided further details on how they would charge or penalize 23andMe, if found in violation of GDPR or PIPEDA. “No further comment will be made while the investigation is ongoing,” the UK ICO said. 23andMe acknowledges the joint investigation announced by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the UK Information Commissioner today. “We intend to cooperate with these regulators’ reasonable requests relating to the credential stuffing attack discovered in October 2023,” a 23andMe spokesperson told The Cyber Express. Genetic Testing Company 23andMe Data Breach Timeline 23andMe first disclosed details of the October data breach in an 8-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The genetic testing company said attackers scraped profiles of 23andMe users who opted in to using the company’s DNA Relatives feature. This profiling feature connects users with genetic distant relatives - or other 23andMe users who share their bits of DNA. The attackers used credential stuffing attacks that affected 0.1% of user accounts, the company told SEC. Using these accounts as a launchpad, hackers were able to access “a significant number of files containing profile information about other users' ancestry.” Threat actors claimed on underground forums that they were able to siphon “20 million pieces of code” from 23andMe. The claimed data set included information DNA ancestry backgrounds belonging to more than 1.3 million Ashkenazi Jewish and Chinese users. By the end of October, another threat actor claimed compromise of 4 million genetic profiles, which the company also investigated. The genetic testing company 23andMe said it notified the affected 6.9 million users - 5.5 million DNA Relatives profiles and 1.4 million Family Tree profile – in December. The company told federal regulators that the data breach incident was set to incur between $1 million and $2 million in one-time expenses. The company faces at least 30 class action lawsuits in U.S.state and federal jurisdictions as well as in Canada. 23andMe blamed the customers’ poor security hygiene for the breach and has since made two-step verification a prerequisite for account logon. It also mandated customers to reset their passwords. *Update 1 (June 12 – 12:00 AM EST): Added response from the 23andMe spokesperson.
Findlay Automotive Group, a prominent dealership network with operations spanning Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Washington, and Idaho, recently identified a cybersecurity issue impacting certain areas of its IT infrastructure. Upon discovery, the company swiftly launched an investigation, joining the expertise of leading show more ...
cybersecurity professionals and collaborating with law enforcement agencies to address the Findlay Automotive cybersecurity issue. While the investigation is ongoing, Findlay Automotive is actively working to mitigate the issue and restore full operational capabilities. However, no details related to the data compromised and the extent of the data breach have been provided by the Officials of Findlay Automotive Group. “Promptly after becoming aware of the issue, we launched an investigation with the assistance of leading cybersecurity experts and law enforcement. Our investigation is ongoing, and we are working diligently to resolve the matter,” reads the company’s statement on Facebook. [caption id="attachment_76709" align="aligncenter" width="760"] Source: Findlay Automotive's Facebook Post[/caption] Operational Impact of Findlay Automotive Cybersecurity Issue Despite the restrictions imposed by the Findlay Automotive cybersecurity issue, all dealership locations remain open. Customers with vehicles currently in service are encouraged to visit or contact their respective service departments directly for assistance from Findlay’s dedicated staff. "At Findlay Automotive, we have been serving our communities with pride and integrity since 1961," reads the company’s Facebook Post. "We take our responsibility to our customers and the community very seriously. We will continue to provide updates as the investigation continues and more information becomes available.” The urgency and gravity of the situation are highlighted by recent trends in cybersecurity, particularly the rising threat of ransomware attacks in the industrial sector. Rising Cyber Threats in the Industrial Sector In 2019, industrial companies faced significant financial burdens due to ransomware, collectively paying out $6.9 million, which accounted for 62% of the total $11 million spent on ransomware that year. Despite representing only 18% of ransomware cases, the manufacturing sector bore the brunt of the financial impact. By 2020, the cross-industry cost of ransomware had escalated to a staggering $20 billion. Gartner, a research firm, has projected that by 2023, the financial repercussions of cyberattacks on industrial systems, including potential fatal casualties, could exceed $50 billion. The automotive sector, in particular, has become a prime target for cybercriminals. As these threats intensify, paying ransoms become increasingly weak, emphasizing the necessity of enhanced cybersecurity measures to protect assets. The recent Volkswagen incident exemplifies the magnitude of these threats. In April 2024, Volkswagen faced a cyberattack, suspected to originate from Chinese hackers. The breach exposed sensitive data, including development plans for gasoline engines and critical information on e-mobility initiatives. Investigations by ZDF Frontal and “Der Spiegel” revealed more than 40 internal documents, highlighting the severity of the cyberattack. Similarly, in February 2024, Thyssenkrupp's automotive unit in Duisburg, Germany, experienced a cyberattack that disrupted production in its car parts division. Although no data theft or manipulation was detected, the company had to take several systems offline to prevent further unauthorized access, underlining the operational risks posed by such cyber incidents. Closer to home, Eagers Automotive Limited faced a cyber incident on December 27, 2023, leading to a temporary trading halt to address its continuous disclosure obligations. The company issued an apology to its customers for the inconvenience caused by the disruption, reflecting the broad and often immediate impact of cyberattacks on automotive businesses. Findlay Automotive’s proactive response to the current cybersecurity issue demonstrates its commitment to safeguarding its operations and customer trust. The company is maintaining open lines of communication with customers, providing regular updates as the investigation progresses and more information becomes available.
The City of Wichita has made significant progress in recovering from a cyberattack that disrupted many city services early last month. More than a month later, the City of Wichita cyberattack update has come up stating that most public-facing systems are back online, although some services are still being restored. show more ...
The city reports that water metering, billing, and payment processing systems are gradually coming back online. City of Wichita Cyberattack Update Water Services Restored Customers can expect to receive updated statements this week. Auto-payments have resumed normal operations, and customers now have full access to their utility accounts online. Bills can be paid by credit card, cash, check, and money order at City Hall, online at City's payment portal, by calling (316) 265-1300, or through the mail. Due to the cyberattack on City of Wichita, some June bills may cover more than 60 days of service. Customers needing help with these bills are encouraged to contact a representative at (316) 265-1300 to arrange a payment plan. Library Services Update The Wichita Public Library has also seen progress, though some services remain affected. Public Wi-Fi is available at all locations, and patrons can access Libby for eBooks, audiobooks, and digital magazines. Additionally, materials can be checked in and out manually. However, hold requests and renewals, customer account information, the online catalog, the automated materials handler at the Advanced Learning Library, and online databases like Kanopy and LinkedIn Learning are still unavailable. Airport and Court Systems At the Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport, public flight and gate display information is not yet available online but is expected to be restored soon. The Municipal Court has made strides in recovery, with most systems operational. The public search of warrants is anticipated to be online by Monday, June 10. The City’s Information Technology team is working to fix the remaining system outages. The city appreciates residents' patience as there may be occasional service interruptions during ongoing recovery efforts. What Happened During the City of Wichita Cyberattack The Cyber Express reported that the cyberattack occurred on May 5, leading to the shutdown of several online city services, including water bill payments, some city-building Wi-Fi, and electronic payments. LockBit, a known ransomware group, claimed responsibility for the cyberattack. This followed an earlier notification from the City of Wichita regarding a ransomware incident, although the responsible group was not initially disclosed. The ransomware attack has shown the vulnerabilities in the city's IT systems and the importance of strong cybersecurity measures. Despite the challenges, the city has worked hard to restore essential services to its residents. The City of Wichita urges residents to stay informed through official updates and to reach out to the provided contact points for help. The city remains committed to being transparent and providing the necessary support to its residents during this recovery period.
A resident of Moreton Bay, Australia was shocked to discover that the private information of several resident ratepayers in the region, including their friends and neighbors, had been accidentally published on the Moreton Bay council's official website. The leaked information included names, residential addresses, show more ...
email addresses, and phone numbers, as well as resident complaints to the council and details about council investigations. Data Breach Discovered By Local Resident City of Moreton Bay resident Piper Lalonde, who works as a data analyst, had discovered the breach along with her husband. They were shocked to learn that their personal information was freely available on the council's customer request online portal. The couple had discovered that the information included their phone numbers, complaints, and requests that they had made for new bins, along with the GPS coordinates of where the requests had been filed. A further investigation into the breach had revealed that the personal information of some of their friends and neighbors who were fellow ratepayers were also available in the records after they conducted a search. Piper reported this information to the council, with the website being taken down the next day. However, she was still unsatisfied with the lack of notification about the incident to impacted residents. Piper stated, "I would expect they'd have to send out some formal communication letting people know their information was publicly accessible, but there was no indication they were going to do that." She expressed concern about the possibility of people stumbling upon complaints made about them by other residents. She added, "If this gets in the wrong hands — it just takes one person to see a complaint about them, and who knows what they'll do." City of Moreton Bay Responses to Data Breach After Piper's report, the website was said to be taken down. The site appears to be functional as of now, with some functions still limited. The website includes an official notice in response to the incident. [caption id="attachment_76878" align="alignnone" width="2204"] Source: moretonbay.qld.gov.au[/caption] We are experiencing system difficulties with our customer request portal. Our third-party provider is investigating a possible information breach. The cause is yet to be determined but there is no indication this is a cyber attack. We will never contact you via unsolicited calls to request sensitive information. No action is required from you at this stage. We will continue to keep you informed. The notice appears to indicate that the breach stemmed from a third-party provider. The Cyber Express team has reached out to the Moreton Bay Council's Privacy Officer for further information on the breach, however no response has been received as of publication time. The potential scale of the data breach, as well as its impact on residents, is currently unknown. It is also unclear on how many individuals may have accessed the available data before the website had been temporarily taken down and subsequently limited. Media Disclaimer: This report is based on internal and external research obtained through various means. The information provided is for reference purposes only, and users bear full responsibility for their reliance on it. The Cyber Express assumes no liability for the accuracy or consequences of using this information.
Microsoft today released updates to fix more than 50 security vulnerabilities in Windows and related software, a relatively light Patch Tuesday this month for Windows users. The software giant also responded to a torrent of negative feedback on a new feature of Redmond’s flagship operating system that constantly show more ...
takes screenshots of whatever users are doing on their computers, saying the feature would no longer be enabled by default. Last month, Microsoft debuted Copilot+ PCs, an AI-enabled version of Windows. Copilot+ ships with a feature nobody asked for that Redmond has aptly dubbed Recall, which constantly takes screenshots of what the user is doing on their PC. Security experts roundly trashed Recall as a fancy keylogger, noting that it would be a gold mine of information for attackers if the user’s PC was compromised with malware. Microsoft countered that Recall snapshots never leave the user’s system, and that even if attackers managed to hack a Copilot+ PC they would not be able to exfiltrate on-device Recall data. But that claim rang hollow after former Microsoft threat analyst Kevin Beaumont detailed on his blog how any user on the system (even a non-administrator) can export Recall data, which is just stored in an SQLite database locally. “I’m not being hyperbolic when I say this is the dumbest cybersecurity move in a decade,” Beaumont said on Mastodon. In a recent Risky Business podcast, host Patrick Gray noted that the screenshots created and indexed by Recall would be a boon to any attacker who suddenly finds himself in an unfamiliar environment. “The first thing you want to do when you get on a machine if you’re up to no good is to figure out how someone did their job,” Gray said. “We saw that in the case of the SWIFT attacks against central banks years ago. Attackers had to do screen recordings to figure out how transfers work. And this could speed up that sort of discovery process.” Responding to the withering criticism of Recall, Microsoft said last week that it will no longer be enabled by default on Copilot+ PCs. Only one of the patches released today — CVE-2004-30080 — earned Microsoft’s most urgent “critical” rating, meaning malware or malcontents could exploit the vulnerability to remotely seize control over a user’s system, without any user interaction. CVE-2024-30080 is a flaw in the Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) service that can allow attackers to execute code of their choosing. Microsoft says exploitation of this weakness is likely, enough to encourage users to disable the vulnerable component if updating isn’t possible in the short run. CVE-2024-30080 has been assigned a CVSS vulnerability score of 9.8 (10 is the worst). Kevin Breen, senior director of threat research at Immersive Labs, said a saving grace is that MSMQ is not a default service on Windows. “A Shodan search for MSMQ reveals there are a few thousand potentially internet-facing MSSQ servers that could be vulnerable to zero-day attacks if not patched quickly,” Breen said. CVE-2024-30078 is a remote code execution weakness in the Windows WiFi Driver, which also has a CVSS score of 9.8. According to Microsoft, an unauthenticated attacker could exploit this bug by sending a malicious data packet to anyone else on the same network — meaning this flaw assumes the attacker has access to the local network. Microsoft also fixed a number of serious security issues with its Office applications, including at least two remote-code execution flaws, said Adam Barnett, lead software engineer at Rapid7. “CVE-2024-30101 is a vulnerability in Outlook; although the Preview Pane is a vector, the user must subsequently perform unspecified specific actions to trigger the vulnerability and the attacker must win a race condition,” Barnett said. “CVE-2024-30104 does not have the Preview Pane as a vector, but nevertheless ends up with a slightly higher CVSS base score of 7.8, since exploitation relies solely on the user opening a malicious file.” Separately, Adobe released security updates for Acrobat, ColdFusion, and Photoshop, among others. As usual, the SANS Internet Storm Center has the skinny on the individual patches released today, indexed by severity, exploitability and urgency. Windows admins should also keep an eye on AskWoody.com, which often publishes early reports of any Windows patches gone awry.
Obtaining — and maintaining — a complete inventory of technology assets is essential to effective enterprise security. How do organizations get that inventory?
Face scans stored like passwords inevitably will be compromised, like passwords are. But there's a crucial difference between the two that organizations can rely on when their manufacturers fail.
Greater collaboration between financial and law enforcement officials is needed to dismantle cybercrime scam centers in Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, which rake in tens of billions of dollars annually — and affect victims worldwide.
Debian Linux Security Advisory 5708-1 - Damian Poddebniak discovered that the Cyrus IMAP server didn't restrict memory allocation for some command arguments which may result in denial of service. This update backports new config directives which allow to configure limits, additional details can be found at.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6830-1 - It was discovered that libndp incorrectly handled certain malformed IPv6 router advertisement packets. A local attacker could use this issue to cause NetworkManager to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6819-2 - Alon Zahavi discovered that the NVMe-oF/TCP subsystem in the Linux kernel did not properly validate H2C PDU data, leading to a null pointer dereference vulnerability. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. Chenyuan Yang discovered that the RDS Protocol show more ...
implementation in the Linux kernel contained an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker could use this to possibly cause a denial of service.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6821-3 - It was discovered that the ATA over Ethernet driver in the Linux kernel contained a race condition, leading to a use-after-free vulnerability. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code. It was discovered that the Atheros 802.11ac wireless show more ...
driver did not properly validate certain data structures, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. An attacker could possibly use this to cause a denial of service.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6820-2 - It was discovered that the ATA over Ethernet driver in the Linux kernel contained a race condition, leading to a use-after-free vulnerability. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code. It was discovered that the Atheros 802.11ac wireless show more ...
driver did not properly validate certain data structures, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. An attacker could possibly use this to cause a denial of service.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6828-1 - Zheng Wang discovered that the Broadcom FullMAC WLAN driver in the Linux kernel contained a race condition during device removal, leading to a use- after-free vulnerability. A physically proximate attacker could possibly use this to cause a denial of service. It was discovered that the show more ...
ATA over Ethernet driver in the Linux kernel contained a race condition, leading to a use-after-free vulnerability. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6826-1 - Karl von Randow discovered that mod_jk was vulnerable to an authentication bypass. If the configuration did not provide explicit mounts for all possible proxied requests, an attacker could possibly use this vulnerability to bypass security constraints configured in httpd.
Ubuntu Security Notice 6823-1 - Multiple security issues were discovered in MySQL and this update includes new upstream MySQL versions to fix these issues. MySQL has been updated to 8.0.37 in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 23.10, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. In addition to security fixes, the updated packages contain bug fixes, new features, and possibly incompatible changes.
Apple Security Advisory 06-10-2024-1 - visionOS 1.2 addresses bypass, code execution, integer overflow, out of bounds access, out of bounds read, and out of bounds write vulnerabilities.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3859-03 - An update for kernel is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service. Issues addressed include a use-after-free vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3855-03 - An update for kernel is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support. Issues addressed include double free and use-after-free vulnerabilities.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3854-03 - An update for kernel-rt is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Support. Issues addressed include double free and use-after-free vulnerabilities.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3846-03 - An update for python-idna is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include a denial of service vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3843-03 - An update for cockpit is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include a code execution vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3842-03 - An update for c-ares is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include an out of bounds read vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3838-03 - An update for ruby is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include HTTP response splitting and denial of service vulnerabilities.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3837-03 - An update for 389-ds-base is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include a denial of service vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3831-03 - An update for containernetworking-plugins is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include a memory exhaustion vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3830-03 - An update for gvisor-tap-vsock is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include a memory exhaustion vulnerability.
Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-3827-03 - An update for buildah is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Issues addressed include memory exhaustion and resource exhaustion vulnerabilities.
Microsoft has released security updates to address 51 flaws as part of its Patch Tuesday updates for June 2024. Of the 51 vulnerabilities, one is rated Critical and 50 are rated Important. This is in addition to 17 vulnerabilities resolved in the Chromium-based Edge browser over the past month. None of the security flaws have been actively exploited in the wild, with one of them listed as
Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed details of an ongoing phishing campaign that leverages recruiting- and job-themed lures to deliver a Windows-based backdoor named WARMCOOKIE. "WARMCOOKIE appears to be an initial backdoor tool used to scout out victim networks and deploy additional payloads," Elastic Security Labs researcher Daniel Stepanic said in a new analysis. "Each sample is compiled
State-sponsored threat actors backed by China gained access to 20,000 Fortinet FortiGate systems worldwide by exploiting a known critical security flaw between 2022 and 2023, indicating that the operation had a broader impact than previously known. "The state actor behind this campaign was already aware of this vulnerability in FortiGate systems at least two months before Fortinet disclosed the
Last week, the notorious hacker gang, ShinyHunters, sent shockwaves across the globe by allegedly plundering 1.3 terabytes of data from 560 million Ticketmaster users. This colossal breach, with a price tag of $500,000, could expose the personal information of a massive swath of the live event company's clientele, igniting a firestorm of concern and outrage. A massive data breach Let’s
Threat actors linked to the Black Basta ransomware may have exploited a recently disclosed privilege escalation flaw in the Microsoft Windows Error Reporting Service as zero-day, according to new findings from Symantec. The security flaw in question is CVE-2024-26169 (CVSS score: 7.8), an elevation of privilege bug in the Windows Error Reporting Service that could be exploited to achieve SYSTEM
Cybersecurity researchers have warned of an ongoing cryptojacking campaign targeting misconfigured Kubernetes clusters to mine Dero cryptocurrency. Cloud security firm Wiz, which shed light on the activity, said it's an updated variant of a financially motivated operation that was first documented by CrowdStrike in March 2023. "In this incident, the threat actor abused anonymous access to an
23andMe, the California-based company which sells DNA testing kits to help people learn about their ancestry and potential health risks, is facing scrutiny from British and Canadian data protection authorities following a security breach that saw hackers compromise the personal data of nearly seven million users. Read more in my article on the Hot for Security blog.