The Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) has issued a vulnerability note (CIVN-2025-0016) highlighting a series of Mozilla vulnerability, including Firefox and Thunderbird. These vulnerabilities, which have a high severity rating, could have far-reaching implications for users by potentially allowing show more ...
remote attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, disclose sensitive information, execute arbitrary code, or trigger denial of service (DoS) conditions on affected systems. Affected Software Versions The vulnerabilities in Mozilla products impact a variety of software versions. Users of the following versions should be particularly cautious: Mozilla Firefox: Versions prior to 135 Mozilla Firefox ESR: Versions prior to 115.20 and 128.7 Mozilla Thunderbird: Versions prior to 135 Mozilla Thunderbird ESR: Versions prior to 128.7 Given the critical nature of these vulnerabilities, all organizations and individuals using Mozilla Firefox or Thunderbird are urged to update their software promptly to mitigate the risks. Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products [caption id="attachment_100846" align="alignnone" width="848"] Vulnerabilities in Mozilla Products (Source: CERT-In)[/caption] The vulnerabilities identified span a wide range of issues, including use-after-free errors, memory safety bugs, and problems with certificate validation. These flaws expose systems to multiple attack vectors, putting users at risk of unauthorized access, system crashes, and data breaches. Key Mozilla Vulnerabilities Identified Use-After-Free in XSLT: Reported as CVE-2025-1009, this flaw in the XSLT component of Mozilla products could cause a crash when manipulated with specially crafted XSLT data. This high-impact vulnerability can be exploited to destabilize the system and potentially lead to code execution. Use-After-Free in Custom Highlight: CVE-2025-1010 pertains to the Custom Highlight API. If exploited, an attacker could trigger a crash, further compromising system stability and security. Memory Safety Bugs: Multiple instances of memory safety bugs were reported, including CVE-2025-1016, CVE-2025-1017, and CVE-2025-1020. These vulnerabilities are highly dangerous as they could lead to arbitrary code execution, providing attackers with control over the affected systems. WebAssembly Code Generation Bug: CVE-2025-1011 points to a WebAssembly bug that could lead to crashes, potentially opening the door for code execution attacks. This moderate impact flaw poses a critical risk, especially for systems running WebAssembly applications. Double-Free Vulnerability in PKCS#7 Decryption: CVE-2024-11704 refers to a double-free vulnerability in PKCS#7 decryption handling. While the risk is considered lower, exploitation could result in memory corruption, further destabilizing the system. Private Browsing Tab Leak: A low-impact issue, CVE-2025-1013, could cause private browsing tabs to open in normal windows. Although this vulnerability doesn't carry significant risk by itself, it compromises user privacy and could expose browsing history. Email Sender Spoofing: A particularly concerning vulnerability, CVE-2025-0510, enables email sender spoofing in Thunderbird. This high-impact flaw could allow a malicious actor to manipulate the sender's address, making it difficult for users to trust the authenticity of incoming emails. Fullscreen Notification Issues: CVE-2025-1018 and CVE-2025-1019 address issues related to fullscreen notifications. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow attackers to hide fullscreen notifications, leading to spoofing attacks. Improper Certificate Length Validation: CVE-2025-1014 concerns improper certificate length validation when certificates are added to stores. While the risk is low, this flaw could be leveraged by attackers to execute malicious actions. Exploiting Mozilla Vulnerabilities Mozilla vulnerabilities, such as those identified in CIVN-2025-0016, can be exploited remotely by attackers through specially crafted web requests. Users could unknowingly trigger these attacks by visiting malicious websites or opening malicious email attachments. The impact of these vulnerabilities ranges from system crashes to severe data breaches and the full compromise of a system. Successful exploitation of these flaws could result in an attacker gaining unauthorized access to sensitive information, executing arbitrary code, or causing disruptions through denial of service. As such, the Mozilla vulnerabilities highlighted in CERT-In’s report represent a security risk that should not be underestimated. Security Fixes and Patches Mozilla has responded swiftly to these vulnerabilities, releasing a series of security fixes across its product range. On February 4, 2025, Mozilla announced the following updates addressing the reported flaws: Firefox 135: Fixed several high-impact vulnerabilities, including the use-after-free flaws in XSLT and Custom Highlight (CVE-2025-1009 and CVE-2025-1010). Firefox ESR 115.20 and 128.7: Both releases included patches for critical vulnerabilities, such as memory safety bugs and use-after-free errors. Thunderbird 135 and ESR 128.7: Updates were also rolled out for Thunderbird, addressing similar vulnerabilities that affect the email client, including email sender spoofing and the WebAssembly bug. These updates are crucial in mitigating the risk associated with Mozilla vulnerabilities and should be installed by all users of Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird as soon as possible. Conclusion The vulnerabilities in Mozilla products highlighted by CERT-In’s vulnerability note (CIVN-2025-0016) highlight the importance of timely software updates. With high-impact flaws affecting Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird, users are strongly encouraged to apply the latest patches and stay vigilant for any signs of exploitation. The identified vulnerabilities could allow attackers to access sensitive data, execute malicious code, or cause disruptions to users’ systems. As always, maintaining up-to-date software is essential to protect against these and other potential security threats.
Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL) highlighted the growing misuse of the Open Graph Spoofing Toolkit, a dangerous tool designed to manipulate Open Graph Protocol metadata to trick users into clicking on harmful links. This exploitation of OG tags is a serious concern, as it opens the door to a wide range of show more ...
phishing attacks that target social media users. The Open Graph Protocol allows web developers to control how their web pages appear when shared on social media. By using specific meta tags in a webpage's HTML, developers can define essential elements such as titles, descriptions, and images that accompany shared links. These OG tags are critical for driving engagement and ensuring that shared content stands out on crowded social media feeds. Content management systems (CMS) like WordPress and Magento automatically generate Open Graph tags, making the sharing process seamless. However, this very automation is being exploited by cybercriminals who manipulate these tags to deceive users into clicking on malicious links. The Rise of the Open Graph Spoofing Toolkit In October 2024, a Russian threat actor released the "OG Spoof" toolkit on an underground marketplace for a staggering $2,500. Initially, the toolkit was developed for the attacker’s own fraudulent operations. However, as their techniques became more refined, the toolkit was made available for purchase by a select few buyers. The toolkit’s purpose was clear: to aid in phishing campaigns that manipulate social media previews, inflating click-through rates and ultimately leading users to harmful destinations. The core functionality of the Open Graph Spoofing Toolkit revolves around manipulating the metadata associated with shared URLs. The toolkit allows attackers to generate deceptive links, often shortened, that appear to originate from trusted sources. By doing so, attackers can bypass security measures and lure users into clicking on links that redirect them to malicious websites. Key Features of the OG Spoof Toolkit The OG Spoof Toolkit offers a range of functionalities designed to make phishing campaigns more effective and covert: Domain Management: The toolkit integrates seamlessly with Cloudflare, giving attackers the ability to manage domain settings, including DNS configurations, without needing manual intervention. Attackers can monitor real-time domain status and track uptime, ensuring that their operations continue smoothly. Advanced Link Spoofing: Attackers can customize how their links appear when shared on social media. They can configure distinct URLs—one for displaying the Open Graph metadata and another for redirecting users after the link is clicked. Additionally, the toolkit includes an "Instant Update of Redirect" feature, allowing attackers to change the destination of a link without altering the URL. This means that attackers can modify links in real-time, responding to user engagement or detection efforts by platforms. Advertising System Integration: The OG Spoof Toolkit is designed to work with various advertising systems, including X Ads (formerly Twitter), and Google Ads. This integration allows attackers to use paid advertisements to distribute their malicious links more effectively. Team Management: The toolkit also supports multiple users, making it ideal for fraudulent groups that wish to collaborate on phishing campaigns. Analytics are provided for each link created, offering insights into how effective each link is in terms of engagement. How the OG Spoof Toolkit Bypasses Security Measures One of the most concerning features of the Open Graph Spoofing Toolkit is its ability to bypass moderation checks that typically detect suspicious content. Social media platforms often use metadata to determine whether a shared link is legitimate. If an attacker can manipulate the Open Graph metadata to make a link appear to originate from a trusted source, they can potentially avoid scrutiny. Once a link is approved and shared, attackers can alter the destination without triggering additional security checks. This means that after a link is initially approved, it can redirect users to malicious or misleading content without any further moderation. As a result, attackers can exploit the initial trust established by the social media platform to deceive users. Conclusion The Open Graph Spoofing Toolkit highlights a growing threat as attackers continue to exploit digital vulnerabilities to execute advanced phishing attacks. By manipulating Open Graph metadata, cybercriminals can create deceptive links that appear legitimate, leading users to phishing sites designed to steal sensitive data. This toolkit lowers the entry barriers for cybercriminals, allowing both experienced and new attackers to conduct sophisticated phishing campaigns. As phishing remains a popular method for spreading malware, especially within Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, the OG Spoof Toolkit is increasingly being used in scams, including cryptocurrency fraud and fake giveaways on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). As these tactics evolve, Cyble’s cutting-edge AI-powered cybersecurity solutions offer crucial protection, enabling organizations to stay ahead of cybercriminals by providing real-time threat intelligence and advanced detection capabilities.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) announced the addition of a critical vulnerability to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2025-0994, affects Trimble Cityworks, a widely used software for asset management and geographic information system show more ...
(GIS) applications. This issue, known as the Trimble Cityworks Deserialization vulnerability, poses cybersecurity risks, especially to federal enterprises, by allowing attackers to execute remote code on affected systems. An Overview of CVE-2025-0994 The CVE-2025-0994 vulnerability exists in Trimble Cityworks versions prior to 15.8.9 and Cityworks with Office Companion versions earlier than 23.10. This deserialization vulnerability enables authenticated users to exploit the software and potentially execute remote code on a vulnerable system. Specifically, the flaw could allow attackers to compromise a customer’s Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) web server, leading to remote code execution (RCE) and potentially giving malicious actors full control over the server. CISA has classified the severity of this vulnerability as High based on its CVSS score of 8.6. The flaw primarily affects the underlying deserialization of untrusted data, a common vector for many cyberattacks. As a result, CVE-2025-0994 has become a matter of concern for organizations relying on vulnerable versions of the software. A Deserialization Attack: What Is at Stake? Deserialization vulnerabilities, like CVE-2025-0994, occur when untrusted data is deserialized into an object that could allow attackers to inject malicious payloads into the application. If exploited, these vulnerabilities enable remote code execution, meaning that an attacker could run arbitrary commands on the affected system, potentially leading to severe security breaches. In this case, Trimble Cityworks’ IIS web server may become a target. As IIS is a core component for hosting Cityworks deployments, any vulnerability in this service could jeopardize the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical data and services. This puts organizations at considerable risk, especially those in sectors where infrastructure management and GIS data are vital. Trimble’s Response: Timely Patches Following the discovery of the vulnerability, Trimble quickly addressed the issue. They released security updates for both Cityworks 15.x and Cityworks 23.x software versions. The updates, which were made available to users on January 28 and 29, 2025, respectively, provide fixes that mitigate the deserialization flaw and prevent remote code execution attacks. Trimble also issued a communication urging on-premise customers to update to the new versions immediately. The company reassured customers that the updates would be applied automatically to Cityworks Online (CWOL) deployments, reducing the need for additional action by users. Additionally, Trimble identified two other potential security concerns in their communication: overprivileged IIS identity permissions and improperly configured attachment directories. These issues were highlighted as further areas for improvement, with specific guidance provided for users to mitigate these risks. The Role of CISA in Addressing Vulnerabilities The inclusion of CVE-2025-0994 in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog emphasizes the increasing significance of cybersecurity in both the public and private sectors. By adding this vulnerability to the catalog, CISA aims to raise awareness and help organizations prioritize the patching of critical vulnerabilities that are actively being exploited by cybercriminals. CISA's catalog serves as an essential resource for federal agencies and other organizations looking to bolster their cybersecurity posture. The catalog is regularly updated with newly discovered vulnerabilities that pose significant threats to critical infrastructure, and CVE-2025-0994 is just one of the latest examples. In this instance, CISA has made it clear that this vulnerability is of particular concern due to its active exploitation in the wild. Organizations are strongly advised to implement the available patches and take other necessary security precautions to protect their systems. Conclusion To mitigate the risks posed by CVE-2025-0994, Trimble Cityworks users must promptly apply the latest patches, ensuring they update to versions 15.8.9 and above for Cityworks 15.x and 23.10 and above for Cityworks with Office Companion. Additionally, it’s crucial to configure IIS identity permissions properly and address attachment directory settings to further enhance security. As these threats continues to target new victims, staying vigilant and addressing vulnerabilities like CVE-2025-0994 is important for protecting sensitive systems. Organizations must prioritize patching and security measures to protect their infrastructure from malicious exploitation.
February is a great month to refresh your cyber awareness skills. February 11 marks Safer Internet Day, encouraging us to work together to make the internet a safer and better place. It’s the perfect time to learn more about cybersecurity risks and best practices for protecting yourself and your loved ones online. show more ...
And while February 14 usually means love is in the air, Valentine’s Day is also a popular day with internet scammers. In 2024, romance scams alone led to losses tallied to $3.8 billion according to the Nasdaq 2024 Global Financial Crime Report. Don’t be wooed by too-good-to-be-true offers, online dating scams, and fraudulent websites. Stay informed about common scams and take action to stay safe. Common Valentine’s Day scams Online dating scamsAI-powered phishing scams are on the rise, impersonating popular online dating platforms. Scammers send fake match emails with malicious links, pretending to be from legitimate dating websites. Tip: Look for misspellings in the dating website name or web address and check the “from field” to make sure it’s a real address. Trust your instinctsIf something feels off—like a relationship escalating too quickly or seeming too perfect—listen to your gut. Tip: Scammers often use rapid declarations of love to emotionally manipulate their victims. Be cautious with platform switchingThink twice before moving a conversation off a dating app to a less secure platform. Tip: Scammers often push for this to avoid detection. Phony gift and delivery servicesScammers often lure victims with heavily discounted flowers, gifts, or even romantic getaway deals on unknown websites. These fraudsters go to great lengths to create the appearance of being legitimate florist, gift basket retailer, or travel agent, setting up websites, placing ads on social media, and sending emails. You go to the website enter your information and credit card details only to receive nothing or something that is not what you ordered. Tip: Always verify websites by checking for HTTPS in the URL and reading online reviews before making a purchase. E-card and gift card scamsWhile digital greeting cards and gift cards are a convenient way to spread love, they’re also a common tool for cybercriminals. Scammers send fake e-cards that contain malware or gift card phishing emails asking you to redeem them on fraudulent websites. Tip: Never open e-cards from unknown senders, and never purchase gift cards as payment for someone you haven’t met in person. How to protect your heart, computer, and wallet from these scams Do your researchBefore opening email or clicking links make sure they are being sent to you by a reputable brand. Webroot Secure VPN + AntiVirus offer real-time protection for your connection and devices while you are browsing the internet. Be cautious sharing personal informationDon’t share sensitive information like credit card details or home address with any website or person unless you are confident in their identity. Consider investing in identity protection security solutions that will monitor the web for unauthorized usage and credit report monitoring, such as Webroot Premium. Secure your devices and backup your dataEnsure your devices have the latest security updates installed. Use Carbonite’s secure, automatic computer backup solution to protect important files from cyber threats. Strengthen your passwords and use two-factor authenticationMake sure to use complex and unique passwords, incorporating letters, numbers and symbols. Consider enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA) for extra security—this helps verify your identity with a second step, like a text or email code. Solutions such as Webroot Premium and Webroot AntiVirus include passwords managers to making it easier to remember all your passwords. Use an all-in-one device, privacy, and protection solutionFor complete device, privacy, and identity protection, consider a solution like Webroot Premium and get the best of all worlds –threat detection, password manager, dark web monitoring, and real-time virus protection. Let’s stay cyber resilient this February and keep Valentine’s Day scam-free! Looking for more information and solutions? Better Business Bureau Romance Scams Report scams at reportfraud.ftc.gov Safer Internet Day Better Internet for Kids Webroot Premium, all-in-one device, privacy, and identity protection Webroot AntiVirus Webroot Secure VPN The post Protect those you love from internet scams this Valentine’s Day appeared first on Webroot Blog.
Researchers from universities in Germany and the U.S. recently showcased an interesting attack — or rather, two attacks — exploiting two different vulnerabilities in Apple CPUs. Picture this: someone sends you a link in a chat. When you click it, nothing looks suspicious at first. It doesnt ask for your work email show more ...
password, doesnt try to get you to download a sketchy file. The page might even contain something fun or useful. But while youre busy browsing it, hidden code is secretly harvesting data from another browser tab — checking your location, recent online purchases, and even stealing your emails. The description of the attack seems simple enough, but in reality, were talking about a very complex attack that exploits the features of so-called speculative execution by the CPU. Wait a minute! Havent we heard this before? You just might have. The core idea of the new attacks resembles various Spectre-type attacks that exploit other, albeit somewhat similar, vulnerabilities in Intel and AMD CPUs. Weve covered those attacks before. In 2022, four years after the first Spectre vulnerability was discovered, we concluded that there was no realistic, easy, or effective way to exploit those vulnerabilities. Although exploiting these new Apple chip vulnerabilities isnt straightforward either, the difference this time is that the researchers have already provided fairly realistic attack scenarios and proved their feasibility. To see just how dangerous these vulnerabilities are, lets briefly recap the basic principles behind all such attacks without getting bogged down in complicated research. Exploiting speculative execution logic Speculative execution refers to a situation where the processor executes the next instruction without waiting for the previous one to finish. Lets draw a somewhat odd yet helpful analogy here with a car. Imagine your car starts the engine automatically every time you approach it. If youre just passing by, the engine stops (as such, the operation is unnecessary). But if youre about to set off driving, its ready to go as soon as you get in. Similarly, a CPU can decide to run an operation in speculative execution mode. And by the time the previous computation is complete, the programs logic might have changed, making this operation unnecessary; in this case its discarded. CPU designers utilize a variety of techniques to improve branch-predictor capability to forecast instructions that are most likely to be executed next. To accomplish this, they gather instruction execution statistics: if a certain code segment is always invoked under particular conditions, its probable that it will be invoked under the same conditions again. Such a computation may involve rather sensitive operations such as accessing protected memory areas containing secret data. The issue lies in the fact that even if a program shouldnt have access to such data, it can still potentially train the speculative execution algorithm to access it. Before the Spectre attack was discovered in August 2018, it wasnt considered to be a data leakage risk. Secret information, such as encryption keys and private user data, is stored in the restricted-access CPU cache. However, the researchers who discovered Spectre found that cached data could be extracted indirectly — by performing hundreds and thousands of read operations and measuring the execution time of these instructions. They found that one could guess cached values that way: if the guess is correct, the instruction would execute fractions of a second faster. So, there are two crucial components to a Spectre-like attack. One is the ability to trick the speculative execution algorithm into accessing a forbidden memory area. The other is the capability to read this data indirectly through a side channel. SLAP and FLOP attacks on Apple CPUs The researchers from Germany and the U.S. wrote two separate papers at once — because theyd discovered two different vulnerabilities in Apple CPUs. One issue was found in the Load Address Predictor. This is one of many speculative execution systems that predicts the RAM address that a running program will most likely access. The second vulnerability was found in the Load Value Predictor system. This additionally attempts to anticipate the actual value that will be retrieved from RAM. The researchers named the two attacks SLAP and FLOP: short for Speculative Load Address Prediction and False Load Output Prediction. Although both attacks have a common principle and result in a similar outcome, the methods of exploiting these vulnerabilities differ significantly — hence the two different studies. In the former case, the researchers demonstrated how the Load Address Predictor could be exploited to read restricted data. In the second case, while no data was actually read, the systems accurate prediction of what would be read could again expose sensitive information. How dangerous are SLAP and FLOP attacks? Nearly all Spectre-type attacks are subject to numerous limitations that hinder their practical use for malicious purposes: The malicious code exploiting a vulnerability in the speculative execution system must be running on the same CPU core as the targeted process. The ability to steal data often depends on the presence of code with certain features in the OS kernel or other software that the attacker has no control over. Carrying out a remote attack over a network or through a browser is extremely difficult because measuring the instruction execution time to obtain data through a side channel becomes a lot more complicated. Therefore, all previous attacks could be categorized as very complex, and only applicable for attempts to access highly valuable data, which means the attacker needed considerable resources to develop such an attack. All in all, thats good news, as patching certain hardware vulnerabilities in production CPUs is either virtually impossible or associated with a substantial decrease in performance. SLAP and FLOP open up a different perspective. They affect the latest processors made by Apple. The Load Address Predictor was introduced on desktop computers and laptops with the Apple M2 CPU model, and mobile devices with the Apple A15. The more advanced Load Value Predictor first appeared in the Apple M3 and A17, respectively. Implementing these attacks is still a challenge. However, a key difference in this study compared to previous ones is that it immediately both proposed and verified the feasibility of practical attacks. The researchers demonstrated how SLAP and FLOP can be used to bypass multiple security layers both in the CPU and the Safari browser to gain access to sensitive data. This alone might not be enough reason for cybercriminals to develop functional malware targeting Apple devices; however, there are other reasons why attempts to use SLAP and FLOP could be made in the wild. Apple devices are rather well protected. Exploits allowing one to bypass an iPhones security system and gain access to the owners private data command exorbitant prices on the gray and black markets. Thus, its reasonable to assume that a hardware vulnerability thats highly likely to remain at least partially unfixed will be exploited in targeted attacks when particularly valuable data is sought. Its therefore not out of the question that well see such vulnerabilities exploited in targeted attacks on Apple devices.
For too long, we've treated our analysts as mere cogs in a machine, expecting them to conform to the limitations of our tools and processes. It's time to revolutionize security operations.
After claiming responsibility for the ransomware attack in 2024, the "Embargo" ransomware group posted 1.15 terabytes of stolen data to its public Tor site.
Attackers are smuggling payment card-skimming malicious code into checkout pages on Magento-based e-commerce sites by abusing the Google Tag Manager ad tool.
A select group will be allowed to observe proceedings at the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in-person for the first time starting this week.
The figures suggest a potential motivation behind the British government’s reported legal order to require Apple to be capable of providing iCloud content upon receipt of a valid warrant.
The British government is dropping the traditional fitness and weapons training for specialist cyber military recruits in order to address a cyber skills shortage within His Majesty’s Armed Forces, including in its arm for offensive operations in the National Cyber Force.
California students suing the Department of Education allege that the agency has potentially put their families at risk by allowing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to obtain information that could reveal they have undocumented family members.
Alabama native Eric Council Jr. confessed to taking over the Securities and Exchange Commission's account and posting false information that caused the price of bitcoin to swing wildly.
Threat actors have been observed exploiting multiple security flaws in various software products, including Progress Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX and Advantive VeraCore, to drop reverse shells and web shells, and maintain persistent remote access to compromised systems. The zero-day exploitation of security flaws in VeraCore has been attributed to a threat actor known as XE Group, a cybercrime
Threat actors have been observed targeting Internet Information Services (IIS) servers in Asia as part of a search engine optimization (SEO) manipulation campaign designed to install BadIIS malware. "It is likely that the campaign is financially motivated since redirecting users to illegal gambling websites shows that attackers deploy BadIIS for profit," Trend Micro researchers Ted Lee and
Zimbra has released software updates to address critical security flaws in its Collaboration software that, if successfully exploited, could result in information disclosure under certain conditions. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-25064, carries a CVSS score of 9.8 out of a maximum of 10.0. It has been described as an SQL injection bug in the ZimbraSync Service SOAP endpoint affecting
In cybersecurity, the smallest crack can lead to the biggest breaches. A leaked encryption key, an unpatched software bug, or an abandoned cloud storage bucket—each one seems minor until it becomes the entry point for an attack. This week, we’ve seen cybercriminals turn overlooked weaknesses into major security threats, proving once again that no system is too small to be targeted. The question
Given Okta's role as a critical part of identity infrastructure, strengthening Okta security is essential. This article covers six key Okta security settings that provide a strong starting point, along with recommendations for implementing continuous monitoring of your Okta security posture. With over 18,000 customers, Okta serves as the cornerstone of identity governance and security for
Threat actors have been observed leveraging Google Tag Manager (GTM) to deliver credit card skimmer malware targeting Magento-based e-commerce websites. Website security company Sucuri said the code, while appearing to be a typical GTM and Google Analytics script used for website analytics and advertising purposes, contains an obfuscated backdoor capable of providing attackers with persistent
North American drivers are continuing to be barraged by waves of scam text messages, telling them that they owe money on unpaid tolls. Do you know what to tell your friends and family to watch out for? Read more in my article on the Hot for Security blog.
As AI advances at a rapid clip, reshaping industries, automating tasks, and redefining what machines can achieve, one question looms large: what remains uniquely human?
Source: www.mcafee.com – Author: McAfee. Cybercriminals will always try to cash in on a good thing, and football is no exception. Online scammers are ramping up for the big game with all types of schemes designed to rip you off and steal your personal info—but you have several ways you can beat them at their show more ...
[…] La entrada Super Scams – Beat the Online Scammers Who Want to Sack Your Big Game – Source:www.mcafee.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: securityaffairs.com – Author: Pierluigi Paganini SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER – ROUND 32 | Security Affairs newsletter Round 510 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION | PlayStation Network outage has been going on for over 24 hours | Kimsuky APT group used show more ...
custom RDP Wrapper version and forceCopy stealer | Russia’s intelligence recruits Ukrainians for […] La entrada SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER – ROUND 32 – Source: securityaffairs.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: securityaffairs.com – Author: Pierluigi Paganini Pierluigi Paganini February 09, 2025 A new round of the weekly SecurityAffairs newsletter arrived! Every week the best security articles from Security Affairs are free in your email box. Enjoy a new round of the weekly SecurityAffairs newsletter, show more ...
including the international press. PlayStation Network outage has been going on […] La entrada Security Affairs newsletter Round 510 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION – Source: securityaffairs.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: www.csoonline.com – Author: NTLM ist aus Sicherheitsperspektive eine Katastrophe. Höchste Zeit, das Uralt-Protokoll für immer loszuwerden. Netzwerksicherheit und NTLM gehen nicht gut zusammen. PeopleImages.com – Yuri A | shutterstock.com Im Jahr 1991 beendete Microsoft seine Partnerschaft mit show more ...
IBM und damit auch die gemeinsame Entwicklungsarbeit an OS/2, um sich seinem eigenen Betriebssystem zu widmen. Dieses […] La entrada So killen Sie NTLM – Source: www.csoonline.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: www.csoonline.com – Author: CISOs are trained to fix problems. Lawyers are trained to find them. The two must work together to address complex challenges like breaches, compliance, or the ethics of emerging technologies. There’s a joke that’s been floating around boardrooms for years: “What’s show more ...
the difference between lawyers and engineers? Lawyers don’t think they’re […] La entrada CISOs: Stop trying to do the lawyer’s job – Source: www.csoonline.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: securityboulevard.com – Author: Amy Cohn Why does the Secure Framework Matter? The focus of this operation isn’t just about the immediate prevention of potential threats but ensuring we have a solid line of defense that could weather any storm thrown our way. It’s all about staying ahead of the show more ...
curve and keeping your organization […] La entrada Building an Impenetrable Framework for Data Security – Source: securityboulevard.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: heimdalsecurity.com – Author: Livia Gyongyoși The European Union’s Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2) is now in effect. And, throughout 2025, governments across the continent will be transposing it into national law. Complying with the regulation involves a combination of changes to show more ...
workflows, employee behavior, and technology. There isn’t a single ‘turnkey’ solution […] La entrada 5 Best NIS2 Compliance Software and Solution Providers – Source: heimdalsecurity.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: www.schneier.com – Author: Bruce Schneier Here’s an easy system for two humans to remotely authenticate to each other, so they can be sure that neither are digital impersonations. To mitigate that risk, I have developed this simple solution where you can setup a unique time-based one-time passcode show more ...
(TOTP) between any pair of persons. This […] La entrada Pairwise Authentication of Humans – Source: www.schneier.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.
Source: www.hackerone.com – Author: Caroline Collins. Security teams deal with an overwhelming volume of reports, alerts, and vulnerability data—but without the right prioritization, it’s easy to waste time on low-impact issues while critical risks go unnoticed. Static benchmarks don’t adapt to show more ...
real-world threats, and manual analysis is too slow to keep up with the evolving […] La entrada Gain Actionable, Data-backed Insights with HackerOne Recommendations – Source:www.hackerone.com se publicó primero en CISO2CISO.COM & CYBER SECURITY GROUP.